Board Thread:News/@comment-10948389-20160903170709/@comment-10948389-20160903220246

Thegoldnguy wrote: Understood. However, I think the span of time in which you get banned should be considered. If the person in question is generally unpleasant to be around and is banned multiple times within a short amount of time, the fourth ban should be the nail in the coffin, so-to-speak.

Based on the logic of this ban rule, someone could get banned three times within two months, but after a year of getting no bans they could suddenly get perma-banned because it's their fourth time. What I'm saying is that there should be a cooldown period.

Well, the span of the time should be considered, obviously. If I didn't point that out, I'll edit it in.

" Based on the logic of this ban rule, someone could get banned three times within two months, but after a year of getting no bans they could suddenly get perma-banned because it's their fourth time.  What I'm saying is that there should be a cooldown period."

And could you expand on this? Do you mean that there should be some sort of a resting period if they have not received their final ban for a long time?